Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Sotted, Not Besotted

The headline: "She Can Play That Game, Too." The subhead: "The guys on college campuses want to have casual sex, and the girls want romance, right? Increasingly, however, women are the ones looking to hook up." The photo: an 8.5" x 8.5" shot of an unidentified though clearly eager young woman inviting a man into her bed.

The story, which ran from page one of the Sunday Styles section of the New York Times of July 14, jumped inside to two full pages, where seven additional anonymized photos suggested that a hookup orgy was underway at the University of Pennsylvania, the lucky Ivy chosen for this investigation by Times reporter Kate Taylor.

Her readers were so turned on by the account of Penn women's lust for casual sex that it instantly became the paper's most emailed article, and as of this writing had drawn some 800 comments. If nothing else, this attests to the staying power of Times readers, for the piece ran upward of 100 paragraphs.

I mention this count because not until paragraph sixty-five did Taylor get around to noting: "Women said universally that hookups could not exist without alcohol, because they were for the most part too uncomfortable to pair off with men they did not know well without being drunk." (My italics.)

That observation strikes this old-fashioned journalist as worthy of placement just a tad or two higher in the story. Instead, Taylor devoted the first three-fifths of her piece to anonymous quotes ("I positioned myself in college in such a way that I can't have a meaningful romantic relationship because I'm always busy . . . .") and the usual bakeoff between experts (hooking up is a functional strategy for hard-charging women, says one; they'll be sorry, says another).


Taylor eventually deals briefly with date rape and the roles of alcohol and drugs in hookups (though not STDs). But she moves quickly on, to a study of 24,000 students at twenty-one universities. It showed, said New York University sociologist Paula England, who led the study, that women "tended to fare much better sexually in relationships than in hookups." 

So it would seem. Dig deep enough into the article and you discover that the headlines, pictures and first half of the piece are mostly a tabloid tease.  "For all the focus on hook-ups," Taylor writes in paragraph eighty-one, "campuses are not sexual free-for-alls, at Penn or elsewhere. At colleges nationally, by senior year, 4 in 10 students are either virgins or have had intercourse with only one person, according to the Online College Social Life Survey."

College drinking, on the other hand . . . .

*   *   *

After the Barn Update: Thanks to Chris Robley, who blogs for Book Baby, which converted and distributed my memoir, for devoting a post to the book. 




1 comment:

  1. It's so nice to have someone holding the Times to account for something. I wish you were a whole periodical, with a staff and so on. In other words, I want MORE. Now, things are so much worse--I think we also need a magazine called ITS, just because of the iPad, which auto-corrects to it's. I think people have forgotten that there are two meanings. As to the Times, aren't they always, poor darlings, desperate for something sexy? It clouds their judgment.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are welcome: